Skip to main content

Forensic Technique

Study Course Description

Course Description Statuss:Approved
Course Description Version:7.00
Study Course Accepted:17.08.2022 15:46:03
Study Course Information
Course Code:JF_349LQF level:Level 6
Credit Points:3.00ECTS:4.50
Branch of Science:Law; Theory of Forensic Science and Investigation Field WorkTarget Audience:Person and Property Defence
Study Course Supervisor
Course Supervisor:Aelita Zīle
Study Course Implementer
Structural Unit:Faculty of Law
The Head of Structural Unit:
Contacts:Faculty of Law, Dzirciema Street 16, jfatrsu[pnkts]lv, LV-1007, +371 67409218
Study Course Planning
Full-Time - Semester No.1
Lectures (count)18Lecture Length (academic hours)2Total Contact Hours of Lectures36
Classes (count)6Class Length (academic hours)2Total Contact Hours of Classes12
Total Contact Hours48
Part-Time - Semester No.1
Lectures (count)6Lecture Length (academic hours)2Total Contact Hours of Lectures12
Classes (count)3Class Length (academic hours)2Total Contact Hours of Classes6
Total Contact Hours18
Study course description
Preliminary Knowledge:
Forensic Tactics and Methods
Objective:
Gain theoretical knowledge and practical skills of theoretical and organisational basis for the forensic investigation, understanding the basic principles of conducting forensic investigation and modern possibilities. Tasks: 1. Develop students’ understanding of forensic technique; 2. Develop students’ understanding of theoretical and organisational basis of forensic investigation; 3. Develop students’ understanding of technical devices and methods for examination of evidence; 4. Develop students’ understanding of the possibilities of various types of forensic investigation.
Topic Layout (Full-Time)
No.TopicType of ImplementationNumberVenue
1General characterisation, concept, types and application of the forensic technique. Technical devices and methods for examination of physical evidence.Lectures2.00auditorium
2Traces at the scene, the mechanism of their formation. Technical tools and techniques for detecting, documenting, removing and packing individual types of trace evidence. Collecting comparison samples.Lectures2.00auditorium
Classes1.00auditorium
3Peculiarities for conducting scene assessment of various types of criminal offences (murders, sex offences, fires, etc.) Forensic databases, their creation and use. Theoretical and organisational aspects of forensic investigations.Lectures2.00auditorium
Classes1.00auditorium
4Basics of forensic dactyloscopy. Basics of biological forensic investigation. Basics of forensic odontology.Lectures2.00auditorium
Classes1.00auditorium
5Basics of trace investigation. Basics of forensic ballistics.Lectures2.00auditorium
Classes1.00auditorium
6Basics of habitology (identification of individuals according to their appearance features) in forensic investigation.Lectures2.00auditorium
7Basics of forensic document examination. Basics of forensic handwriting and signature analysis. Basics of forensic linguistics.Lectures2.00auditorium
8Basics of forensic information technology. Basics of audio forensic examination.Lectures2.00auditorium
Classes1.00auditorium
9Basics of forensic chemistry.Lectures2.00auditorium
Classes1.00auditorium
Topic Layout (Part-Time)
No.TopicType of ImplementationNumberVenue
1General characterisation, concept, types and application of the forensic technique. Technical devices and methods for examination of physical evidence.Lectures0.50auditorium
2Traces at the scene, the mechanism of their formation. Technical tools and techniques for detecting, documenting, removing and packing individual types of trace evidence. Collecting comparison samples.Lectures1.00auditorium
Classes0.50auditorium
3Peculiarities for conducting scene assessment of various types of criminal offences (murders, sex offences, fires, etc.) Forensic databases, their creation and use. Theoretical and organisational aspects of forensic investigations.Lectures1.00auditorium
Classes0.50auditorium
4Basics of forensic dactyloscopy. Basics of biological forensic investigation. Basics of forensic odontology.Lectures0.50auditorium
Classes0.50auditorium
5Basics of trace investigation. Basics of forensic ballistics.Lectures0.50auditorium
Classes0.50auditorium
6Basics of habitology (identification of individuals according to their appearance features) in forensic investigation.Lectures0.50auditorium
7Basics of forensic document examination. Basics of forensic handwriting and signature analysis. Basics of forensic linguistics.Lectures1.00auditorium
8Basics of forensic information technology. Basics of audio forensic examination.Lectures0.50auditorium
Classes0.50auditorium
9Basics of forensic chemistry.Lectures0.50auditorium
Classes0.50auditorium
Assessment
Unaided Work:
Analysis of literature and the research conducted, a report, completion of practical assignments.
Assessment Criteria:
A successfully written and presented report on the research carried out, successfully completed practical assignments, participation in seminars.
Final Examination (Full-Time):Exam (Written)
Final Examination (Part-Time):Exam (Written)
Learning Outcomes
Knowledge:- The student has acquired knowledge of forensic technique and theoretical and organisational basis for forensic investigations; - The student has acquired knowledge of technical tools and methods for examination of physical evidence; - The student has acquired knowledge of the possibilities of various types of forensic investigation; - The student has acquired knowledge of collecting various types of samples for comparative study; - The student has acquired knowledge of creation and possibilities of forensic databases. - The student is able to demonstrate basic and specialised knowledge of forensic techniques, part of which is in line with the level of highest achievements of the relevant field of science; - The student is able to demonstrate understanding of the most important concepts and regularities of the forensic techniques.
Skills:- Students are able to continuously structure their learning, analyse their level of knowledge and rationally improve it; select and evaluate the sources of literature and are able to develop their scientific research skills; - Students are able to demonstrate a scientific approach to tackling problems by making decisions and creative solutions in problem solving with responsibility and initiative, by doing work both individually and in a team and by managing other people’s work; - Students are able to use the theoretical knowledge and practical skills acquired in formulating and analytically describing the information obtained, the problems identified and possible solutions in a particular sector of science, explaining, arguing and discussing both with professionals and non-professionals in the area concerned; - Students are able to take responsibility for their decisions and activities, take critical decisions and find solutions under unforeseen and changing circumstances, adapt to new situations and be open to change, take leadership and initiative and respond to consequences, comply with ethical standards and demonstrate broad general knowledge and competence. Improve the ability to listen to different opinions. - The student is able to take decisions independently on the application of technical tools and methods for detecting , documenting and removing physical evidence; able to apply independently various technical tools and methods in detecting, documenting and removing physical evidence; able to take decisions independently on transportation of various types of examination objects and traces for further examination at an institution of forensic investigation; able to independently take samples for comparative analysis; able to take full advantage of forensic databases in the detection of criminal offences.
Competencies:- The student is able to use theoretical knowledge and skills in professional and personal development; - The student is able to offer not only formal solutions to the challenges of forensic sector but to find solutions that serve the wishes and priorities of the community (local community) and improve public administration in general, by demonstrating professional ethics; - The student is able to independently obtain, select and analyse the information, participate in the development of the relevant professional field and find solutions to the situation in the relevant scientific field. - The student is able to take decisions independently on the application of the technical tool and method concerned in detecting, documenting and removing physical evidence; able to independently take samples for comparative analysis; able to take decisions independently on transportation of various types of examination objects for further examination at an institution of forensic investigation; able to use forensic databases in the detection of criminal offences.
Bibliography
No.Reference
Required Reading
1EIROPAS PARLAMENTA UN PADOMES REGULA (ES) 2016/679 (2016. gada 27. aprīlis) par fizisku personu aizsardzību attiecībā uz personas datu apstrādi un šādu datu brīvu apriti un ar ko atceļ Direktīvu 95/46/EK (Vispārīgā datu aizsardzības regula)
2Biometrijas datu apstrādes sistēmas likums: LR likums. Latvijas Vēstnesis Nr. 90 (4076), 10.06.2009.
3Krimināllikums: LR likums. Latvijas Vēstnesis Nr.199/200 (1260/1261), 08.07.1998.
4Kriminālprocesa likums: LR likums. Latvijas Vēstnesis Nr.74 (3232), 11.05.2005.
5DNS nacionālās datu bāzes izveidošanas un izmantošanas likums: LR likums. Latvijas Vēstnesis Nr. 106 (3054), 07.07.2004.
6Operatīvās darbības likums: LR likums. Latvijas Vēstnesis Nr. 131, 30.12.1993.
7Par narkotisko un psihotropo vielu un zāļu likumīgās aprites kārtību: LR likums. Latvijas Vēstnesis Nr. 89 (574), 23.05.1996.
8Tiesu ekspertu likums: LR likums. Latvijas Vēstnesis Nr. 42 (5614), 01.03.2016.
9DNS nacionālajā datu bāzē iekļaujamo ziņu sniegšanas, kā arī bioloģiskā materiāla un bioloģiskās izcelsmes pēdu izņemšanas kārtība: Ministru Kabineta 23.08.2005. noteikumi Nr. 620. Latvijas Vēstnesis Nr. 135 (3293), 26.08.2005.
10Biometrijas datu apstrādes sistēmas noteikumi: Ministru kabineta 06.05.2014. noteikumi Nr.234. Latvijas Vēstnesis Nr. 87 (5147), 08.05.2014.
11Kārtība, kādā pazudušu personu tuvi radinieki dod rakstveida piekrišanu salīdzināmo paraugu un ziņu iekļaušanai DNS nacionālajā datu bāzē un to apstrādei: Ministru kabineta 10.05.2005. noteikumi Nr.319. Latvijas Vēstnesis Nr. 76 (3234), 13.05.2005.
12Noteikumi par DNS nacionālajā datu bāzē iekļautās informācijas sniegšanu: Ministru kabineta 13.06.2005. noteikumi Nr. 698. Latvijas Vēstnesis Nr. 147 (3305), 15.09.2005.
13Noteikumi par rīcību ar lietiskajiem pierādījumiem un arestēto mantu: Ministru kabineta 27.12.2011. noteikumi Nr.1025. Latvijas Vēstnesis Nr. 205 (4603), 30.12.2011.
14Noteikumi par tiesu ekspertīžu iestāžu sarakstu un tiesu ekspertu specialitāšu klasifikatoru: Ministru kabineta 20.12.2016. noteikumi Nr. 835. Latvijas Vēstnesis Nr. 251 (5823), 23.12.2016.
15Tiesu ekspertīžu organizēšanas kārtība: Ministru kabineta 13.09.2016. noteikumi Nr. 606. Latvijas Vēstnesis Nr. 179 (5751), 15.09.2016.
16Aggrawal A., Necrophilia: Forensic and Medico-legal Aspects. CRC Press, 2016.
17Arājs, O., Grundšteins, D. Trasoloģisko ekspertīžu metodika. Valsts policijas Kriminālistikas pārvalde, 2005.
18Berezins, A. Svešu un viltotu karšu izmantošanas izmeklēšana: teorētiskie un metodiskie aspekti. Rīga, Latvijas Universitāte, 2014.
19Bialek, I., Brozowski, J., Lukasik A. Comparison of the Efectiveness of Selected Methods of Contrasting of Fingerprints in Blood.Problems of Forensic Sciences, 2004, Vol.LIX.50-65.
20Bulgakova, I. Izmeklēšanas izpratne un saturs pirmstiesas procesā, 2006.
21Champod, C. jt. Fingerprints and Other Ridge Skin Impressions. CRC Press LLC, 2004
22Čentoricka, M. Pirkstu pēdu atklāšanas un izņemšanas līdzekļi un metodes. Rīga, Latvijas Vēstnesis, 2002.
23Daktiloskopija. Aut. kol. O. Arājs, M. Čentoricka, S. Silarāja, A. Evardsons. Rīga, Latvijas Vēstnesis, 2005.
24Dombrovskis, R. Kriminālistikas teorētiskie pamati. Rīga, ,,Biznesa augstskola Turība" SIA, 2003.
25Eriksons, S.A., Risplings, U. Identifikācijas pamati. Rīga, Latvijas Policijas akadēmija, 2000.
26Evardsons, A. Ekspertīzes noteikšanas pamatprincipi. Rīga, Biznesa augstskola Turība, 2007.
27Evardsons, A. Kriminālistikas tehniskie līdzekļi. Rīga, Biznesa augstskola Turība, 2007.
28Fregeau C.J., Germain O., Fourney R.M.Fingerprint Enhancement Revisited and the Effects of Blood Enhancement Chemicals on Subsequent Profile Plus™ Flouorescent Short Tandem Repeat DNA Analysis of Fresh and Agend Bloody Fingerprints. Journal Forensic Sciences, 45(2).354-380.
29Grieznis, P. Praktiskā kriminālistika. Rīga,“Likuma vārdā”, 2000.
30Houck, M.M., Siegel, J.A. Fundamentals of Forensic Science. China: ELSEVIER, 2006.
31Inman, K., Rudin, N. Principles and Practice of Criminalistics. The Profession of Forensic Science. USA: CRC Press, 2001.
32Jēkabsone, V. Pierādījumu un pierādīšanas pasaulē. Administratīvā un Kriminālā justīcija. Nr. 2/98.
33Konovalovs, J. Vielas kā noziedzīga nodarījuma pēdas. Rīga, SIA ,,Petrovskis un Ko”, 2007.
34Konovalovs, J., Kļaviņa, Z. Kriminālistiskā odoroloģija (cilvēka smaržu pēdas). Rīga: SIA ,,Petrovskis un Ko”,2003.
35Kriminālistikas tehnika. Mācību grāmata, I daļa, IV izdevums. Autoru grupa profesora A. Kavaliera vadībā. Rīga, Latvijas Policijas akadēmija, 2003.
36Kriminālistikas taktika. Mācību grāmata, II daļa, IV izdevums. Autoru grupa profesora A. Kavaliera vadībā. Rīga, Latvijas Policijas akadēmija, 2003.
37Kriminālistikas metodika. Mācību grāmata, III daļa. Autoru grupa profesora A. Kavaliera vadībā. Rīga, Latvijas Policijas akadēmija, 2005.
38Criminalistics. Conspectus of Lectures. Riga, [b.i.], 2009.
39Lawley, R. Application of Amido Black Mixture for the Development of Blood – based Fingerprints on Human Skin. Journal of Forensic Identification, 2003, 53 (4). 404-408.
40Nīmande, E., Terehovičs, V. Kriminālistikas iespējas antikriminālās politikas jomā // Jurista vārds, 2007.gada 30.oktobris, Nr. 44 (497), 12. lpp.
41Ouens D., Noziegums un zinātne.Zvaigzne ABC, Rīga, 2000.
42Nīmande, E. Kriminalistiskas mācības par noziedzīgu nodarījumu teorētiskie aspekti (Kriminalistikas objekts un metodes kā izzināšanas procesa struktūras elementi). Promocijas darbs. Latvijas Universitāte. Rīga, 2006.
43Rekomendācijas lietisko pierādījumu izņemšanai notikuma vietas apskates laikā. Rīga: Valsts tiesu ekspertīžu birojs, 2005.
44Robinson, E.M. Crime Scene Photography. Elsevier, 2010.
45Šāviena pēdas un to izpēte ar skenējošo elektronu mikroskopu. Mācību metodiskais līdzeklis. Aut. kol. G.Bebris, V.Veseris, A.Patmalnieks. Rīga, 2009.
46Tetetris, O. Tiesu medicīnas esence. Rīga: Apgāds ,, Rasa ABC”, 2004.
47Valsts policijas Kriminālistikas pārvalde. Notikuma vietas apskates eksperta rokasgrāmata. Rīga: Valsts policija, 2014.
48Valsts policijas Kriminālistikas pārvalde, Tiesu ekspertīze un noziedzīga nodarījuma notikuma vietas apskate. Vadlīnijas ekspertīžu noteikšanai un darbam notikuma vieta, 2015.
49Vernon, J. Geberth. Practical Homicide Investigation. Taylor & Francis Group, 2006.
50Aвдeeвa, Г. Влияние субъективного фактора на формирование внутреннего убеждения судебного эксперта.“ Criminalist Криминалистъ первопечатный№10/2015.
51Анищенко, И. А. Дактилоскопия и дактилоскопическая экспертиза :практич. пособие /подред. 2-еизд.испр.идоп. _М.:Юрлитинформ, 2013.
52Бастыркин, А.И. Криминалистика. Техника, тактика и методика расследования преступлений. Cанкт-Петербург, Издательство ,,Проспект”, 2011.
53Визгрин, И.А. Введение в криминалистику. История, основы теории, библиография. Cанкт-Петербург: Юридический центр Пресс, 2003.
54Гортинский, А.В. К вопросу о комплексной экспертизе документов, изготовленных в сфере компьютерных технологий. Информатика в судебной экспертизе: Сб.тр. Саратов: СЮИ МВД России, 2003.
55Карлов, В.Я. Криминалистика. Тезаурс – словарь. Схемы. Москва: Альфа – Пресс, 2011.
56Ларин, М.В. Развитие понятия «документ». [b.v.] Делопроизводство. Норма, 2006.
57Назаров, Г. Н., Пашинян, Г. А. Медико - криминалистическое исследование следов крови. Нижний Новгород: Издательство Нижегородской государственной медицинской академии,2003.
58Самищенко, С.С. Современная дактилоскопия: проблемы и тенденции развития. Академия управления МВД России, 2002.
59Старовойтов, В.И., Шамонова, Т.Н. 2003. Запах и ольфакторные следы человека. Москва: ЛексЭст.
60Технико-криминалистическая экспертиза документов: учебник / под ред. В. Е. Ляпичева, Н. Н. Шведовой. – 3-е изд., стереотип. – Волгоград : ВА МВД России, 2011. – 268 с.
61Шухнин, М.Н., Яковлев, Ф.Н. О классификации признаков в компьютерно-технической экспертизе документов. Информатика в судебной экспертизе: Сб.тр. Саратов: СЮИ МВД России, 2003.
62Шурухнов, Н.Г. Криминалистика. Определения, схемы, таблицы, диаграммы, рекомендации. Москва: издательство Эксмо,2008.
Additional Reading
1Forensic Evidence in Canada. Ed.by G.M. Chayko, E.D. Gulliver, D.V. Macdougall. Ontario, Canada Law Book INC, 1991.
2Indulēns, I. Kriminālistika. Rīga, ,,Zvaigzne", 1978.
3Saferstein, R. Criminalistics an Introduction to Forensic Sciene. New Jerrsey, Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, 2001.
4The Fingerprint Sourcebook. Ed.by E.H. Holder, L. O. Robinson, J.Laub. Lexington, National Justice of Justice USA, 2013.
5Torvalds, J. Kriminālistikas simt gadu.Rīga, “LIESMA”, 1973.
6Zauers, A. Kriminālistiskā ekspertīze Latvijā laikmetu griežos. Rīga, Latvijas Policijas akadēmija, 2001.
7Белкин, Р.С. Криминалистика. Краткая энциклопедия. Москва, Научное издательство ,,Большая Российская Энциклопедия, 1993.
8Грановский, Г.Л. Основы трасологий. Общая частъ. Москва, 1965.
9Грановский, Г.Л. Основы трасологий. Особенная частъ. Москва, 1974.
10Палий, В.М. Криминалистическое исследование документов, изготовленных на знакопечатающих устройствах. Киев: Редакционно-издательский отдел МВД УССР, 1989.
11Сосенушкина М.Н.и др. Технико-криминалистическая экспертиза документов (основные термины и понятия). Справочное пособие. Москва: ЭКЦ МВД России, 2005.
12Справочные данные об орудиях письма, используемые при криминалистических исследованиях / Под ред. В. А. Снеткова. - М., 1987.
13Судебно-техническая экспертиза документов. Учебно-методическое пособие. Выпуск 5 – М., 1973. – 95 с.
14Судебно-техническая экспертиза документов. Особенная часть (особен¬ности исследования отдельных специфических объектов судебно-техниче¬ской эксперизы документов). Вып. 3. Метод, нос. Москва: [b.i.], 1995.
Other Information Sources
1Nedēļraksts ,, Jurista vārds”.
2RSU Juridiskās fakultātes elektroniskais juridisko zinātnisko rakstu žurnāls "Socrates"
3Žurnāls ,,Administratīvā un kriminālā justīcija”.
4www.vtmec.gov.lv
5www.ekspertize.vp.gov.lv
6www.forensics-news.com
7www.vteb.gov.lv
8www.bvda.com/EN/
9www.sirchie.com
10www.spheron.com/home.html