Basics of Psychological Assesment (VPUPK_385)
About Study Course
Objective
Provide students with an appropriate understanding of the theoretical, methodological and ethical basics of psychological research and assessment at the level of the academic bachelor, developing the ability to analyse and critically evaluate psychological research and evaluation methods and instruments based on the principles of validity, reliability, fairness and interpretation, as well as justifiably choose and academic interpretation of assessment results in a simulated or research context, respecting the requirements of use of tests, digital security and data protection without professional psychological evaluation, diagnosis or provision of opinions, and recognising the limits of competence of the bachelor level.
Prerequisites
General psychology, cognitive psychology, personality psychology, developmental psychology, psychometrics.
Learning outcomes
1.1. Defines basic concepts of psychological research and evaluation (design, measurement, interpretation, measurement error, validity, reliability/accuracy, fairness).
2. Clarifies the basic principles for the selection and use of instruments in an academic context (objective-target group-situation-constraints).
3. Describe ethical, legal and data protection principles of psychological research, including digital testing risks and basic safety requirements.
4. Describe the types of psychometric quality information (e.g. reliability indicators, validity evidence) and their role in interpretation.
1.1. Find and use instrument documentation (“test instruction”) to determine the purpose, target group, administration conditions and interpretation limitations of the instrument.
2. Select and justify the suitability of the instrument in a simple simulated research scenario based on quality information and ethical/data protection requirements.
3. Analyse the quality description of the instrument and identify the main risks (fairness, digital environment, interpretation error) in a particular situation.
4. Draw up a description/interpretation of academic results for educational purposes, clearly indicating limitations.
1.1. Observe professional boundaries when carrying out research tasks in an academic environment (no clinical conclusions/diagnoses are made; differentiates teaching interpretation from professional assessment).
2. Demonstrate responsible handling of sensitive data (confidentiality, secure storage, digital security) in study and research tasks.
3. Argue their choice in an academic discussion in accordance with the principles of scientific reasoning and academic integrity.
Study course planning
| Study programme | Study semester | Program level | Study course category | Lecturers | Schedule |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 3 | Bachelor | Required | Gunita Skaldere-Darmudasa |
| Study programme | Study semester | Program level | Study course category | Lecturers | Schedule |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 4 | Bachelor | Required | Gunita Skaldere-Darmudasa |
