.
Individual Supervision
Study Course Description
Course Description Statuss:Approved
Course Description Version:5.00
Study Course Accepted:03.05.2022 08:53:32
Study Course Information | |||||||||
Course Code: | VPUPK_252 | LQF level: | Level 7 | ||||||
Credit Points: | 2.00 | ECTS: | 3.00 | ||||||
Branch of Science: | Pedagogy | Target Audience: | Pedagogy | ||||||
Study Course Supervisor | |||||||||
Course Supervisor: | Baiba Pumpiņa | ||||||||
Study Course Implementer | |||||||||
Structural Unit: | Department of Health Psychology and Paedagogy | ||||||||
The Head of Structural Unit: | |||||||||
Contacts: | Riga, 5 J. Asara Street, vppkrsu[pnkts]lv, +37167061587 | ||||||||
Study Course Planning | |||||||||
Full-Time - Semester No.1 | |||||||||
Lectures (count) | 6 | Lecture Length (academic hours) | 2 | Total Contact Hours of Lectures | 12 | ||||
Classes (count) | 6 | Class Length (academic hours) | 2 | Total Contact Hours of Classes | 12 | ||||
Total Contact Hours | 24 | ||||||||
Study course description | |||||||||
Preliminary Knowledge: | Professional activities of the supervisor. | ||||||||
Objective: | To develop knowledge, skills and competence to manage individual supervision process. | ||||||||
Topic Layout (Full-Time) | |||||||||
No. | Topic | Type of Implementation | Number | Venue | |||||
1 | Functions of individual supervision. Cyclic model in individual supervision (agreement, focus, space, bridge, review). Conclusion of the supervision agreement (duration of supervision, number of sessions, terms of agreement, responsibility, confidentiality, principles of cooperation and other administrative matters). | Lectures | 1.00 | auditorium | |||||
Classes | 1.00 | auditorium | |||||||
2 | Specifics of the supervision process in individual supervision. Experimental learning and reflection in supervision. Reflective circle pattern in supervision. Model development. Reflective circle pattern in individual learning supervision. Appropriate interventions using reflective circle model in individual supervision. | Lectures | 1.00 | auditorium | |||||
Classes | 1.00 | auditorium | |||||||
3 | Two interrelated systems for individual supervision: advisory system and supervision system. Focus points in supervision. | Lectures | 1.00 | auditorium | |||||
Classes | 1.00 | auditorium | |||||||
4 | Focus on System 1 analysis (consultative system). 1st system's content analysis, used evaluation strategies and interventions, study of process and connection. | Lectures | 1.00 | auditorium | |||||
Classes | 1.00 | auditorium | |||||||
5 | Focus on System 2 analysis (supervision system). Focus on a broader context. 2nd system's content analysis and use of psychodynamic concepts in supervision. | Lectures | 1.00 | auditorium | |||||
Classes | 1.00 | auditorium | |||||||
6 | Analysis and evaluation of the development of the dynamics and supervision of the professional development of the supervisee. A crisis situation. Crisis stages, complications. Crisis intervention in supervision. | Lectures | 1.00 | auditorium | |||||
Classes | 1.00 | auditorium | |||||||
Assessment | |||||||||
Unaided Work: | Independently strengthens lecture material by systematically reading the indicated sources. Leads individual training in 3-way simulation games using the Reflective circle model. Carries out a written case-by-case analysis of supervision, where the postgraduate student has been a supervisor (the supervised and presented supervision is coordinated with the supervisor) according to the given criteria, and presents the results. Fills in a professional growth diary. | ||||||||
Assessment Criteria: | To analyse in writing one case of individual training supervision, where the master student has been a supervisor according to the given criteria and present the results. Written diary of professional growth. Requirements for case study supervision case analysis. To analyse in writing one of the training supervisors from the group of three, where the master student has been a supervisor (the supervised and presented supervision is coordinated with the supervisor) according to the plan: 1) Initial purpose/question of supervision 2) The central issue of supervision 3) Which focal point corresponds to the purpose and/or question of the supervision (justify what it is) 4) Short description of the supervision process (main milestones) 5) Analyse whether the focal point(s) has(ve) been selected appropriately for supervision 6) Is there and what is my counterpart transponder as a supervisor 7) Analyse whether the goal of supervision was achieved/ answered the question of the supervision (to justify why it was/ was not achieved) 8) What is the (real) result of supervision 9) Supervision function(s) implemented in supervision (to substantiate what demonstrates it) | ||||||||
Final Examination (Full-Time): | Exam | ||||||||
Final Examination (Part-Time): | |||||||||
Learning Outcomes | |||||||||
Knowledge: | By analysing the training supervisions, student theoretically explains the functions of individual supervision, the prerequisites of the individual supervision process and the forming factors, the need for different focus points of the supervision in different professional environments. Characterises and describes the use of reflective circle model and psychodynamic concepts in individual supervision, possibilities of supervision planning and evaluation of results. | ||||||||
Skills: | In individual training supervisions conducted in the form of a simulation game the student uses the model of the reflective circle and the corresponding interventions. In case studies the student identifies the functions of supervision, its focus points, and assesses the dynamics and results of process of the supervision. The student forms documentation that is related to process and result summarisation of the training supervision. | ||||||||
Competencies: | Student performs analysis of case studies of individual supervision processes, organises and manages training supervisions in the form of simulation games, according to the needs of supervised persons described in case analysis and specifics of professional environment. When conducting training supervision, the basic principles of professional and general ethics are observed. During the training supervision and when analysing the training supervision, student recognises their professional limitations and opportunities. Makes a diary of professional growth. | ||||||||
Clinical Skills: | |||||||||
No. | Skill | Level | |||||||
1 | Application of voice and speech qualities in consulting | B2 - Intermediate level | |||||||
2 | Asking questions | B2 - Intermediate level | |||||||
3 | Eye contact in consulting | B2 - Intermediate level | |||||||
4 | Encouraging | B2 - Intermediate level | |||||||
5 | Feedback | B2 - Intermediate level | |||||||
6 | Focusing | B2 - Intermediate level | |||||||
7 | Hear key words | B2 - Intermediate level | |||||||
8 | I/ Others noticing statements | B2 - Intermediate level | |||||||
9 | Paraphrasing | B2 - Intermediate level | |||||||
10 | Professional self-reflection in consulting | B2 - Intermediate level | |||||||
11 | Structuring the session / consultation | B2 - Intermediate level | |||||||
12 | Summarizing | B2 - Intermediate level | |||||||
Bibliography | |||||||||
No. | Reference | ||||||||
Required Reading | |||||||||
1 | Individuālā supervīzija. (2017). No K. Mārtinsone, S. Mihailova (sast.) Rakstu krājuma Supervīzija: Teorija. Pētījumi. Prakse (65.-76. lpp). Rīga, RSU | ||||||||
2 | Supervīzija: Teorija. Pētījumi. Prakse. Rakstu krājums. (2017). K. Mārtinsone, S. Mihailova (sast.) Rīga, RSU | ||||||||
Additional Reading | |||||||||
1 | Aasheim, L.L. (2012). Practical clinical supervision for counselors: an experiential guide. New York: Springer | ||||||||
2 | Driscoll, J. (2007). Practising clinical supervision: a reflective approach for healthcare professionals. Edinburgh: Elsevier. | ||||||||
3 | Apine, E. (projekta vadītāja). (2007). Supervīzija sociālajā darbā. Supervizora rokasgrāmata. Rīga: Latvijas Universitāte. | ||||||||
4 | Bernard, J.M. (2014). Fundamentals of clinical supervision. Harlow: Pearson. | ||||||||
5 | Carroll, M. (2014). Effective supervision for the helping professions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE | ||||||||
6 | Thomas, F.N. (2013). Solution-focused supervision: a resource-oriented approach to developing clinical expertise. New York: Springer. | ||||||||
7 | Hawkins P., Shohet R. (2020) Supervision in the helping Professions. An idividual, group and organizational approach. Open University Press: Buckingham, Philadelphia. | ||||||||
8 | Kulbergs, J. (2001). Dinamiskā psihiatrija. Jumava | ||||||||
9 | Kulbergs, J. (1998). Krīze un attīstība. PLA | ||||||||
10 | Hawkins, Peter. (2020). Supervision in the Helping Professions. 5th edition. New York : Open University Press. |