Test and Survey Registry

The Test and Survey Registry compiles and is regularly updated with information about tests and surveys (hereinafter referred to as instruments) that have been developed and adapted in various fields at Rīga Stradiņš University (RSU).

Why was it created, and how can it help students and lecturers?

The registry was created to ensure the availability of instruments developed and adapted by RSU students and lecturers.

The publicly accessible part of the register includes basic information such as the name of instrument in Latvian and its original language, details about the authors and adaptation authors, as well as the year of publication and adaptation.

How to obtain a test or survey from the Psychology Laboratory registry?

1. Under each category, you will find instruments adapted or developed by RSU. For example, the Intelligence Structure Test I-S-T 2000 R can be found under the Intelligence and Cognitive Abilities category.
2. Once you find the instrument you are interested in, contact us via email at tarrsu[pnkts]lv to clarify information about the instrument, its availability, usage options, and conditions.
3. To receive the desired instrument, you must fulfill the requirements stated in point 4 of the instrument description and submit an application (forms available below) via email to tarrsu[pnkts]lv.
4. The application will be reviewed at the next Psychology Laboratory meeting, which takes place once a month.
5. Upon approval, you will receive the signed application and the instrument via email.

Intelligence and Cognitive Abilities

Name of the instrument in Latvian	Original name of the instrument	Original author(s) of the instrument and year of publication	Adaptation author(s) and year of publication of the adapted version	Terms of use of the instrument*
Uzmanības noturības pārbaudes tests	Sustained Attention to Response Task, SART	Robertson, 1997	Šmate, 2021	A
Intelekta struktūras tests I-S-T 2000 R	Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R (I-S-T 2000 R)	Liepmann et al., 2000	Ļubenko, u. c., 2022	C
Monreālas kognitīvo funkciju novērtēšanas skala, 8.2. versija	Montreal Cognitive Assessment  test, v8.2. (MoCA)	Nasreddin, 1996	Šneidere, u. c., 2023	C
Šternberga darba atmiņas tests	Sternberg Task	Sternberg, 1966	Dance, 2023	A
Kognitīvās refleksijas tests, CRT	Cognitive Reflection Test  (CRT)	Frederick, 2005	Mārtinsone un Regzdiņa, 2019	B

* Explanation of Instrument Usage Condition Criteria A, B, and C (Detailed information is available in each instrument's description.)

A – The instrument is freely available for non-commercial research, provided that precise references to the instrument's authors are cited. (The instrument can be obtained by submitting an application to the Psychology Laboratory.)
B – A formal authorization is required. (Permission must be obtained from the authors or copyright holders, and the received authorization or a link to publicly available information about the permission must be submitted along with the application to the Psychology Laboratory.)
C – Only the instrument description is available in the Psychology Laboratory. (To obtain the instrument for use, direct contact with the copyright holder is required. Usage of the instrument may be subject to a fee or other conditions.)

For more detailed information about specific instruments, including their psychometric properties, you can request additional information via email at tarrsu[pnkts]lv.

The Psychology Laboratory's available information regarding instrument usage conditions may be incomplete or subject to change. In compliance with copyright regulations, always verify whether the usage conditions have been updated before using an instrument. If necessary, follow the instructions provided by the instrument author or copyright holder.

If you notice any discrepancies between the information in the register and the information obtained directly from the authors, please report this via email at tarrsu[pnkts]lv.

When using an instrument in your work, always provide a proper citation: Author's first and last name, instrument title in its original language, and year. Check whether the author has specific citation requirements. If the instrument has been adapted, additionally include adaptation author(s), title in Latvian, year of adaptation, source of acquisition (e.g., RSU Psychology Laboratory’s Registry of Tests and Surveys).

Personality, Personality Traits, Types, Emotional States

Name of the instrument in Latvian	Original name of the instrument	Original author(s) of the instrument and year of publication	Adaptation author(s) and year of publication of the adapted version	Terms of use of the instrument*
A. Przybylski Bailes palaist garām (FOMO) aptauja	Fear of Missing Out scale (FoMOs)	Przybylski et al., 2013	Alicia-Karin Goetsch, 2024	A
Latvijas Klīniskais personības tests (LKPT)		Perepjolkina u. c., 2020		C
Latvijas Klīniskais personības tests (LKPT, krievu valodas versija Latvijai)	Русская версия Латвийского клинического личностного теста	Perepjolkina u. c., 2023		C
Latvijas Personības aptauja (LPA-v3)		Perepjolkina un Reņģe, 2013		A
Emociju regulācijas prasmju aptauja	Emotion Regulation Skills Questionnaire, ERSQ-27	Berking & Znoj, 2008	Kristiņa-Everte u. c., 2021	B
Empātijas koeficienta skala	The Empathy Quotient (EQ)	Baron-Cohen & Wheelwright, 2004	Savicka, 2021	B
Īsā tumšās triādes aptauja	Short Dark Triad [SD3]	Jones & Paulhus, 2013	Kuharenoka un Jokste, 2023	B
Lielā trijnieka perfekcionisma skala	The Big Three Perfectionism Scale (BTPS)	Smith, 2016	Kraveca un Jokste, 2023	B
Kauna un vainas ievirzes  aptauja	Guilt and Shame Proneness Scale, GASP	Cohen, 2011	Ķirsis, 2012	C
Pašsajūtas, aktivitātes un noskaņojuma aptauja	Опросник САН: самочувствие, активность, настроение	Доскин, и др., 1973	Treide, S., 2018	A
UCLA vientulības skala	UCLA Loneliness Scale Version 3	Russell, 1996	Perepjolkina un Zariņa, 2009, 2022	A
Uz mākslu balstīts iz/novērtēšanas instruments „Putna ligzdas zīmējums”	Bird's nest drawing	Kaiser, 1996	Šķone, 2014	B
Uz mākslu balstīts iz/novērtēšanas instruments „Sešu daļu stāsts”	Six-piece story making (6-PSM)	Dent-Brown, 2004	Meluškāne un Greiškalna, 2018	B
Kognitīvās fleksibilitātes skala	Cognitive Flexibility Scale (CFS)	Martin & Rubin, 1995	Urtāne, 2022	B
Sociālo problēmu risināšanas prasmju aptauja	Social problem-solving inventory—revised (SPSI-R)	D’Zurilla, et al., 2002	Koļesņikova, 2013	B
Sociālo problēmu risināšanas prasmju aptauja īsā versija (LV)	Social problem-solving inventory—revised (SPSI-R)	D’Zurilla, et al., 2002	Skaldere-Darmudasa un Koļesņikova, 2020	B
Sociālo problēmu risināšanas prasmju aptauja īsā versija (krievu valodā Latvijai)	Social problem-solving inventory—revised (SPSI-R)	D’Zurilla, et al., 2002	Koļesņikova, 2020	B
Problēmsituāciju pārvarēšanas pieeju aptauja (COPE-LV)	COPE (The Coping Orientation of Problem Experience Inventory)	Carver, et al., 1989	Petrova, 2009; Knipše, 2010; precizējuši Perepjolkina un Gaidis, 2016	A
Daudzdimensiju ķermeņa apzinātības skala	Multidimensional Asessment of Interoseptive Awareness, Version2 (MAIA-2)	Mehling, 2018	Krizska-Popova un Majore-Dūšele, 2020	A
Melburnas lēmumu pieņemšanas aptauja	The Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire	Mann et al., 1997	Sprudzāne, 2023	A
Dzīves orientācijas aptauja	Life Orientation Test – Revised, LOT	Scheier, et al., 1994	Izašare, 2016	B
Konores–Deividsona psiholoģiskās noturības aptauja	Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale, CD– RISC– 25	Connor & Davidson, 2003	Skaldere-Darmudasa un Sudraba, 2021	C
Psiholoģiskās noturības aptauja	Mental Toughness Scale (MTS)	Dr. Leilani Madrigal, 2013	Mazūrs, M., 2021	B
Īsā dzīvesspēka skala	The Brief Resilience Scale	Smith, 2008	Freimane, 2010	A
Kognitīvo kļūdu aptauja, CD-Quest	Cognitive Distortions Questionnaire, CD-Quest	De Oliveira,  et al, 2015	Mārtinsone un Regzdiņa, 2019	B
PVO–5 labbūtības indekss (1998. gada versija)	WHO (Five) Well-Being Index (1998 version)	WHO, 1998	Boļšakova un Perepjolkina, 2023	A

* Explanation of Instrument Usage Condition Criteria A, B, and C (Detailed information is available in each instrument's description.)

A – The instrument is freely available for non-commercial research, provided that precise references to the instrument's authors are cited. (The instrument can be obtained by submitting an application to the Psychology Laboratory.)
B – A formal authorization is required. (Permission must be obtained from the authors or copyright holders, and the received authorization or a link to publicly available information about the permission must be submitted along with the application to the Psychology Laboratory.)
C – Only the instrument description is available in the Psychology Laboratory. (To obtain the instrument for use, direct contact with the copyright holder is required. Usage of the instrument may be subject to a fee or other conditions.)

For more detailed information about specific instruments, including their psychometric properties, you can request additional information via email at tarrsu[pnkts]lv.

The Psychology Laboratory's available information regarding instrument usage conditions may be incomplete or subject to change. In compliance with copyright regulations, always verify whether the usage conditions have been updated before using an instrument. If necessary, follow the instructions provided by the instrument author or copyright holder.

If you notice any discrepancies between the information in the register and the information obtained directly from the authors, please report this via email at tarrsu[pnkts]lv.

When using an instrument in your work, always provide a proper citation: Author's first and last name, instrument title in its original language, and year. Check whether the author has specific citation requirements. If the instrument has been adapted, additionally include adaptation author(s), title in Latvian, year of adaptation, source of acquisition (e.g., RSU Psychology Laboratory’s Registry of Tests and Surveys).

Motivation, Values, Interests, Beliefs (including Spirituality and Religiosity)

Name of the instrument in Latvian	Original name of the instrument	Original author(s) of the instrument and year of publication	Adaptation author(s) and year of publication of the adapted version	Terms of use of the instrument*
Prokrastinācijas novērtēšanas skala	Procrastination Assessment Scale for Students (PASS)	Solomon & Rothblum, 1984	Alksne, 2023	A
Reliģiskās spriedzes aptauja	Religious and Spiritual Struggles Scale (RSS Scale)	Exline et al., 2014	Putniņa u.c. 2021	B
Situatīvās motivācijas skala	Situational Motivation Scale, SIMS	Guay, et al., 2000	Ābola, 2014	A
Fatālisma skala	Fatalism scale	Shen, et al., 2009	Babre, 2016	B
Garīgā intelekta pašvērtējuma aptauja, SISRI-24	Spiritual intelligence self-report inventory, SISRI-24	King & DeCicco, 2009	Mārtinsone un Regzdiņa, 2019	B
Reliģiskās problēmu pārvarēšanas skalas īsā versija	Brief Religious Coping Scale, RCOPE	Pargament, et al., 2011	Trups-Kalne, 2019	A
Reliģijas centralitātes skala	The Centrality of Religiousity Scale, CRS-5	Huber, 2012	Trups-Kalne, 2019	A
Attieksme pret savu novecošanu	Attitude toward own aging	Lawton, 1975	Fomičeva, J., 2019	A
Misticisma skala (MSkala V2)	Mysticism Scale (M-Scale)	Hood, 1975, 2001	Bitēna un Mārtinsone, 2020	B
Ticības pārdabiskajam pašnovērtējuma aptauja, SBS-6	Supernatural Belief Scale, SBS-6	Young & Halberstadt, 2016	Mārtinsone un Regzdiņa, 2017	B
Grūtnieču zināšanas un attieksme par gripas vakcināciju	Seasonal influenza vaccination in pregnant women: knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors	Napolitano, et al., 2016	Zommere, 2020	B
Attieksme pret fizioloģisku dzemdību veicināšanu skala	Skala zur Förderung der normalen Geburt; Attitude towards promoting normal birth scale	Zinsser, et al., 2016	Kļaviņa, 2019	B
Vispārējās pašefektivitātes skala	General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE)	Schwarzer, & Jerusalem, 1995	Griškēviča un Iltners, 2021	A
Garīgā apvedceļa skala	Spiritual Bypass Scale-13	Fox, et al., 2018	Laskova, 2023	B
Pašpalīdzības stratēģiju aptauja		Mārtinsone u. c., 2021		B

* Explanation of Instrument Usage Condition Criteria A, B, and C (Detailed information is available in each instrument's description.)

A – The instrument is freely available for non-commercial research, provided that precise references to the instrument's authors are cited. (The instrument can be obtained by submitting an application to the Psychology Laboratory.)
B – A formal authorization is required. (Permission must be obtained from the authors or copyright holders, and the received authorization or a link to publicly available information about the permission must be submitted along with the application to the Psychology Laboratory.)
C – Only the instrument description is available in the Psychology Laboratory. (To obtain the instrument for use, direct contact with the copyright holder is required. Usage of the instrument may be subject to a fee or other conditions.)

For more detailed information about specific instruments, including their psychometric properties, you can request additional information via email at tarrsu[pnkts]lv.

The Psychology Laboratory's available information regarding instrument usage conditions may be incomplete or subject to change. In compliance with copyright regulations, always verify whether the usage conditions have been updated before using an instrument. If necessary, follow the instructions provided by the instrument author or copyright holder.

If you notice any discrepancies between the information in the register and the information obtained directly from the authors, please report this via email at tarrsu[pnkts]lv.

When using an instrument in your work, always provide a proper citation: Author's first and last name, instrument title in its original language, and year. Check whether the author has specific citation requirements. If the instrument has been adapted, additionally include adaptation author(s), title in Latvian, year of adaptation, source of acquisition (e.g., RSU Psychology Laboratory’s Registry of Tests and Surveys).

Organizational Psychology (including Healthcare Work Environment), Community Functioning

Instrumenta nosaukums latviešu valodā	Original name of the instrument	Instrumenta oriģināla autors/-i un publicēšanas gads	Instrumenta adaptācijas autors/-i un adaptētās versijas publicēšanas gads	Terms of use of the instrument*
Vienaldzīgas strādāšanas aptauja	Quiet Quitting scale	Galanis et al., 2023	Lankrete un Hofmane, 2024	B
Darba spēju novērtēšanas indekss	Work Ability Index	Institute of Occupational Health, 1994; Tuomi K. et al.	Bula, 2016	A
Profesionālās dzīves kvalitātes skala	Professional Quality of Life Scale (PROQOL)	Stamm, 2010	Circenis, 2013	A
Drošības attieksmes anketa – operācijas zāles versija	Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (Operating Room Version) – SAQ-OR	Sexton, et al., 2006	Aleksandrova,  2018	B
Māsu darba vides organizatorisko faktoru skala	The Practice Environment Scale - Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI)	Lake, 2002	Apine, 2019	B
Intervijas metode – MAPO indeksa datu noteikšanas veidlapa 1	MAPO index – Movement and Assistance of Hospital Patients – 2008	Battevi et al., 2008	Krēvica, 2016	B
Novērojuma metode – MAPO indeksa datu noteikšanas veidlapa 2	MAPO index - Movement and Assistance of Hospital Patients - 2008	Battevi et al., 2008	Krēvica, 2016	B
Veselības aprūpes personāla drošības kultūras uztveres noteikšanas anketa		ASV Slimību profilakses un kontroles centrs	Juhna, 2016	B
Anketa ”Veselības aprūpes personāla pakļaušanās saskarei ar asinīm vai ķermeņa šķidrumiem”		ASV Slimību profilakses un kontroles centrs	Juhna, 2016	B
Aptauja par bērnu māsu zināšanām un attieksmi par sāpēm pie apdegumiem, ortopēdiskajiem un mugurkaula ievainojumiem	The Pediatric Nurses' Knowledge and Attitude Survey Regarding Pain	Manworren and Shriners Hospitals for Children, 2002	Gromova, 2019	B
Drošības attieksmes aptauja LV un RUS	Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ)	Sexton et al., 2006	Barkovska, 2019	B
Nodaļas pacientu aprūpes komandas darba aptauja	Inpatient nursing teamwork survey	Kalisch, 2008	Zdora, 2016	B
Kuopio Universitātes slimnīcas darba apmierinātības skala (lietošanai māsu populācijā)	Kuopio University Hospital Job Satisfaction Scale (KUHJSS)	Kvist, et al., 2013	Nagle, 2018	B
Māsu profesionālo vērtību skala–trīs	Nurses Professional Values Scale–Three (NPVS–3)	Weis, & Schank, 2017	Briede, 2019	B
Kopenhāgenas psihosociālā aptauja – vidējā versija	The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire II – medium version (COPSOQ-II)	COPSOQ International Network, 2019	Kokina, 2020	A
Potenciālās kadru mainības novērtēšanas anketa	Anticipated Turnover scale	Hinshaw & Atwood, 1984	Rituma, 2017	B
Komandas darba kvalitātes pašnovērtējums	Observational teamwork assessment for surgery (OTAS)	Hull, 2011	Priede, 2020	A
Vecmātes profilēšanas anketa	Midwife Profiling Questionnaire, MidProQ	Vermeulen et al, 2018	Baškevica, A., 2020	B
Ķirurģiskās aprūpes māsas kompetences pašnovērtējums un darba pieredze ar pacientiem ar psihiskiem veselības traucējumiem	Hospital Staff Nurse Perceptions of Competency to Care for Patients With Psychiatric or Behavioral Health Concerns	Rutledge et al, 2013	Razumovska, 2020	B
Daudzfaktoru vadības anketa (DVA) forma S6	Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) Form 6S	Avolio & Bass, 1995	Liepniece-Liepiņa, 2020	B
Darba ārējās un iekšējās motivācijas skala	The Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale (WEIMS)	Tremblay, et al., 2009	Puzāne, 2020	B
Māsu profesionālās kompetences komponentu pašnovērtējuma skala	Nurse Competence Scale	Meretoja et al., 2004	Antonova, 2020	B
Komunikatīvās tolerances tests	Опросник комуникативной толерантности Бойко	Бойко, 1998	Babko-Volkova, 2019	B
Labas māsu aprūpes skala	Good Nursing Care Scale for Patients (GNCS –P) and Nurses (GNCS – N)	Leino–Kilpi, 2013	Mālniece, 2019	B
Darba stresa anketa	The Work Stress Questionnaire	Holmgren, 2008	Hasanova, 2022	B
Psiholoģiskās palīdzības sniedzēju profesionālās identitātes aptauja (PPS PI V2)		Akmane u.c., 2021		A
Nepilnīgi veikta pacientu aprūpe un tās iemesli	Missed nursing care and reasons for missed nursing care	Kalisch, 2008	Zdora, 2016	B
Nemedicīnisku ārstēšanas aspektu noteikšana, kas saistīti ar pacientu likumīgo tiesību aizsardzību (pacientu lietošanai)	Determination of non-medical aspect of treatment relating to the protection of the patients’ legitimate rights	Gromulska,  et al., 2013	Nagle, 2018	B
Paplašināta māsu stresa skala	Expanded Nursing Stress Scale (ENSS)	French, et al., 1995	Duļkeviča, 2019/ atjaunota versija Tjarvja, 2022	B
Morāla distresa mērījumi – veselības aprūpes profesionāļiem	Measure of Moral Distress – Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP)	Epstein, et al., 2019	Cereļa, 2021	B
Vardarbība darba vietā veselības aprūpes sektorā	Workplace Violence in the Health Sector	World Health Organisation, 2003	Bula, 2016	B

* Explanation of Instrument Usage Condition Criteria A, B, and C (Detailed information is available in each instrument's description.)

A – The instrument is freely available for non-commercial research, provided that precise references to the instrument's authors are cited. (The instrument can be obtained by submitting an application to the Psychology Laboratory.)
B – A formal authorization is required. (Permission must be obtained from the authors or copyright holders, and the received authorization or a link to publicly available information about the permission must be submitted along with the application to the Psychology Laboratory.)
C – Only the instrument description is available in the Psychology Laboratory. (To obtain the instrument for use, direct contact with the copyright holder is required. Usage of the instrument may be subject to a fee or other conditions.)

For more detailed information about specific instruments, including their psychometric properties, you can request additional information via email at tarrsu[pnkts]lv.

The Psychology Laboratory's available information regarding instrument usage conditions may be incomplete or subject to change. In compliance with copyright regulations, always verify whether the usage conditions have been updated before using an instrument. If necessary, follow the instructions provided by the instrument author or copyright holder.

If you notice any discrepancies between the information in the register and the information obtained directly from the authors, please report this via email at tarrsu[pnkts]lv.

When using an instrument in your work, always provide a proper citation: Author's first and last name, instrument title in its original language, and year. Check whether the author has specific citation requirements. If the instrument has been adapted, additionally include adaptation author(s), title in Latvian, year of adaptation, source of acquisition (e.g., RSU Psychology Laboratory’s Registry of Tests and Surveys).

Family, Dyadic, or Group Functioning

Instrumenta nosaukums latviešu valodā	Original name of the instrument	Original author(s) of the instrument and year of publication	Adaptation author(s) and year of publication of the adapted version	Terms of use of the instrument*
Digitālā greizsirdības skala	The Digital Jealousy Scale	Gubler et al., 2023	Rusanova un Jokste, 2024	A
Apmierinātība ar pāra attiecībām	Relationship Assessment Scale, RAS	Hendrick, 1988	Lielā, 2016	B
Emocionālās vardarbibas aptauja	Emotional abuse questionnaire	Momtaz, et al., 2020	Solovjova, 2021	B
Ģimenes perfekcionisma skala	Family Almost Perfect Scale	Wang, 2010	Jokste un Āboliņa, 2021	A
Bērna-vecāka attiecību skalas īsā forma	Child-Parent relationship scale short form	Pianta, 1992	Briede, 2021	A
Attiecību kvalitātes skala	Relationship Quality (RQ) scale	Chonody, et al., 2018	Lapiņš, 2022	B

* Explanation of Instrument Usage Condition Criteria A, B, and C (Detailed information is available in each instrument's description.)

A – The instrument is freely available for non-commercial research, provided that precise references to the instrument's authors are cited. (The instrument can be obtained by submitting an application to the Psychology Laboratory.)
B – A formal authorization is required. (Permission must be obtained from the authors or copyright holders, and the received authorization or a link to publicly available information about the permission must be submitted along with the application to the Psychology Laboratory.)
C – Only the instrument description is available in the Psychology Laboratory. (To obtain the instrument for use, direct contact with the copyright holder is required. Usage of the instrument may be subject to a fee or other conditions.)

For more detailed information about specific instruments, including their psychometric properties, you can request additional information via email at tarrsu[pnkts]lv.

The Psychology Laboratory's available information regarding instrument usage conditions may be incomplete or subject to change. In compliance with copyright regulations, always verify whether the usage conditions have been updated before using an instrument. If necessary, follow the instructions provided by the instrument author or copyright holder.

If you notice any discrepancies between the information in the register and the information obtained directly from the authors, please report this via email at tarrsu[pnkts]lv.

When using an instrument in your work, always provide a proper citation: Author's first and last name, instrument title in its original language, and year. Check whether the author has specific citation requirements. If the instrument has been adapted, additionally include adaptation author(s), title in Latvian, year of adaptation, source of acquisition (e.g., RSU Psychology Laboratory’s Registry of Tests and Surveys).

Mental Disorders and Pathologies

Instrumenta nosaukums latviešu valodā	Original name of the instrument	Original author(s) of the instrument and year of publication	Adaptation author(s) and year of publication of the adapted version	Terms of use of the instrument*
Sociālo tīklu atkarības skala	Social Networking Addiction Scale (SNAS)	Shahnawaz & Rehman, 2020	Fjodorova, 2024	B
Depresijas, trauksmes un stresa aptauja (atjaunotā LV versija)	Depression Anxiety Stress Scales	Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995	Ozoliņa, 2013	B
Sociālās fobijas anketa	Social phobia Inventory	Connor, et al., 1999	Parele, 2014	C
Geriatrijas trauksmes skala	Geriatric Anxiety Scale - GAS	Segal, 2014	Belonožkina, 2018	B
Ķermeņa tēla distresa situāciju aptauja	The Situational Inventory of Body Image Dysphoria, SIBID	Cash, 2000	Majore-Dūšele un Vāverniece, 2009	B
Pacientu veselības aptauja – 9, PHQ-9 (Depresijas simptomu skrīninga instruments)  LV un RUS	Patient Health Questionnaire 9, PHQ-9	Kroenke, et al., 2001	Rancāns u.c., 2018	A
Ģeneralizēta trauksmes aptauja-7 (GAD-7)	Generalized anxiety disorder scale (GAD-7)	Spitzer, et al., 2006	Vrubļevska u.c., 2022	A
Tehnofobijas tests	Technophobia Measurement	Rosen & Weil, 2000	Zariņa, 2017	C
Pieaugušo UDHS pašnovērtējuma skalas (ASRS-v I.I) simptomu kontrollapa	Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS-v1. 1) symptom checklist	Kessler, et al., 2005	Ennītis u.c., 2021	A
Izdegšanas novērtējuma instruments BAT	Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)	Schaufeli, et al., 2020	Čuhnova, 2022	A
Stresa simptomu skala		Dudkina un Perepjolkina, 2021		A
Insbrukas sociālo kompetenču aptauja	Innsbruck Social Competence Questionnaire	Krug, 2002	Romaško, 2015	C
Latvijas Klīniskais personības tests (LKPT)		Perepjolkina u.c., 2020		C
Latvijas Klīniskais personības tests (LKPT, krievu valodas versija Latvijai)	Русская версия Латвийского клинического личностного теста	Perepjolkina u.c., 2023		C
Geriatrijas depresijas skala	Geriatric Depression Scale	Greenberg, 1982	Voicehovskis, 2013	C
Geriatrijas depresijas skala – īsā versija	Geriatric Depression Scale – short	Sheikh & Yesavage, 1986	Bundzena-Ervika, 2018	A
PVO–5 labbūtības indekss (1998. gada versija)	WHO (Five) Well-Being Index (1998 version)	WHO, 1998	Boļšakova un Perepjolkina, 2023	A

* Explanation of Instrument Usage Condition Criteria A, B, and C (Detailed information is available in each instrument's description.)

A – The instrument is freely available for non-commercial research, provided that precise references to the instrument's authors are cited. (The instrument can be obtained by submitting an application to the Psychology Laboratory.)
B – A formal authorization is required. (Permission must be obtained from the authors or copyright holders, and the received authorization or a link to publicly available information about the permission must be submitted along with the application to the Psychology Laboratory.)
C – Only the instrument description is available in the Psychology Laboratory. (To obtain the instrument for use, direct contact with the copyright holder is required. Usage of the instrument may be subject to a fee or other conditions.)

For more detailed information about specific instruments, including their psychometric properties, you can request additional information via email at tarrsu[pnkts]lv.

The Psychology Laboratory's available information regarding instrument usage conditions may be incomplete or subject to change. In compliance with copyright regulations, always verify whether the usage conditions have been updated before using an instrument. If necessary, follow the instructions provided by the instrument author or copyright holder.

If you notice any discrepancies between the information in the register and the information obtained directly from the authors, please report this via email at tarrsu[pnkts]lv.

When using an instrument in your work, always provide a proper citation: Author's first and last name, instrument title in its original language, and year. Check whether the author has specific citation requirements. If the instrument has been adapted, additionally include adaptation author(s), title in Latvian, year of adaptation, source of acquisition (e.g., RSU Psychology Laboratory’s Registry of Tests and Surveys).

Sports Psychology

Instrumenta nosaukums latviešu valodā	Original name of the instrument	Original author(s) of the instrument and year of publication	Adaptation author(s) and year of publication of the adapted version	Terms of use of the instrument*
Brīvā laika fizisko aktivitāšu aptauja	The Godin Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire	Godin & Shephard, 1985	Diāna Alksne, 2023	A
Dzīves prasmju attīstība caur sportu	Life Skills Scale for Sport (LSSS)	Cronin & Allen, 2017	Blumbergs, 2022	B
Īsā versija sportistu automātiskās iekšējās runas aptaujai ASTQS-LV	A short version of the Automatic Self-Talk Questionnaire for Sports, ASTQS	Zourbanos, et al., 2009	Markāne, 2018	A
Sporta multidimensionālā perfekcionisma skala 2	Competitive Orientations Scale (Sport-MPS-2)	Gotwals & Dunn, 2009	Zaščinska un Upesleja, 2023	B
Iekšējās runas aptauja S-TQ – LV	Self-Talk Questionnaire, S-TQ	Zervas, et al., 2007	Markāne, 2018	A
Uzlabotās sacensību trauksmes skalas 2. versija CSAI-2R-LV	Revised version of the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2, CSAI-2R	Martens, et al., 1990	Markāne, 2018	A

* Explanation of Instrument Usage Condition Criteria A, B, and C (Detailed information is available in each instrument's description.)

A – The instrument is freely available for non-commercial research, provided that precise references to the instrument's authors are cited. (The instrument can be obtained by submitting an application to the Psychology Laboratory.)
B – A formal authorization is required. (Permission must be obtained from the authors or copyright holders, and the received authorization or a link to publicly available information about the permission must be submitted along with the application to the Psychology Laboratory.)
C – Only the instrument description is available in the Psychology Laboratory. (To obtain the instrument for use, direct contact with the copyright holder is required. Usage of the instrument may be subject to a fee or other conditions.)

For more detailed information about specific instruments, including their psychometric properties, you can request additional information via email at tarrsu[pnkts]lv.

The Psychology Laboratory's available information regarding instrument usage conditions may be incomplete or subject to change. In compliance with copyright regulations, always verify whether the usage conditions have been updated before using an instrument. If necessary, follow the instructions provided by the instrument author or copyright holder.

If you notice any discrepancies between the information in the register and the information obtained directly from the authors, please report this via email at tarrsu[pnkts]lv.

When using an instrument in your work, always provide a proper citation: Author's first and last name, instrument title in its original language, and year. Check whether the author has specific citation requirements. If the instrument has been adapted, additionally include adaptation author(s), title in Latvian, year of adaptation, source of acquisition (e.g., RSU Psychology Laboratory’s Registry of Tests and Surveys).

Health and Illness (including Adherence, Health Behavior, Pain)

Instrumenta nosaukums latviešu valodā	Original name of the instrument	Original author(s) of the instrument and year of publication	Adaptation author(s) and year of publication of the adapted version	Terms of use of the instrument*
Medikamentozās līdzestības ziņojuma skala (MARS5)	The Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS5)	Rob Horne, 2019	Preisa, 2024	C
Līdzestības aptauja		Freimane un Koļesņikova, 2017		A
Toronto sāpju pārvaldības uzskaite	Toronto Pain Management Inventory	Watt-Watson, et al., 2001	Vilīte, 2018	B
Amerikas Sāpju biedrības pacientu iznākuma aptauja	American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire	Gordon, et al., 2010	Vilīte, 2018	A
Slimības uztveres anketa LV un RUS	Illness Perception Questionnaire – IPQ-R	Moss-Moriss, et al., 2002	Babre, 2016	B
Holandiešu muskuloskeletālās aptaujas lapa	Dutch Musculoskeletal Questionnaire DMQ - 2001	Hindelbrandt et al., 2010	Krēvica, 2016	B
“Līdzestības līmenis” ar hroniskām slimībām sirgstošiem pacientiem	Опросник “Уровень комплаентности” для людей, страдающих хроническими заболеваниями	Кадыров, 2014	Stepanova, 2020	B
Komforta novērtējuma anketa	General Comfort Questionnaire (GCQ)	Kolcaba, 2003	France, 2020	B
Vienkāršā dzīvesveida rādītāju aptaujas anketa	The Simple Lifestyle Indicator Questionnaire	Godwin, et al., 2008	Plečkena, 2019	B
Menopauzes simptomu novērtēšanas skala	Menopause Rating Scale	Heinemann, 2003	Beļajeva, 2019	A
Nemierīgo kāju sindroma vērtēšanas skala	Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale	Rosenstengel, 2003	Pudāne, 2019	B
Morsas krišanas riska līmeņa noteikšanas rīks	Morse Fall Scale	Morse	Vītiņa, 2017	B
Trīs faktoru ēšanas aptauja R18V2	Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-R18V2 (TFEQ -R18V2)	Cappelleri et al., 2009	Rasmane, 2022	B
Līdzestīgās uzvedības aptauja		Skaldere-Darmudasa un Sudraba (2022)		A
Wijma dzemdību gaidu/pieredzes aptauja	The Wijma Delivery Expectancy / Experience Questionnaire (WDEQ)	Wijma et al., 1998	Krūmiņa, 2018	B
Dzemdību pieredzes aptauja 2	Childbirth experience questionnaire 2; CEQ2	Walker, et al., 2019	Čerņaka, 2022	B
Atbalstošas aprūpes vajadzību aptauja (SCNS-SF34)	The supportive care needs survey short form 34 (SCNS-SF34)	Boyes et al, 2009	Minkeviča, 2020	B
Sagatavotības izvērtēšanas pārvešanai mājās pēc insulta aptauja	The Preparedness Assessment for the Transition Home After Stroke (PATH-S)	Camicia & Lutz., 2018	Mihailova, 2022	B
Osvestrija nespējas indeksa anketa	Oswestry Low back pain questionnaire	Cole, et al., 2013	Guščina, 2016	B
Kognitīvo rezervju indeksa aptauja	Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire	Nucci, et al., 2012	Šneidere un Harlamova, 2017	A
Zīdīšanas pašefektivitātes noteikšanas skala	Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale - Short Form	Dennis, 2013	Goldmane, 2020	B
Attieksme pret fizioloģisku dzemdību veicināšanu skala	Skala zur Förderung der normalen Geburt; Attitude towards promoting normal birth scale	Zinsser, et al., 2016	Kļaviņa, 2019	B
Grūtnieču zināšanas un attieksme par gripas vakcināciju	Seasonal influenza vaccination in pregnant women: knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors	Napolitano, et al., 2016	Zommere, 2020	B
Universāls malnutrīcijas  skrīnings	Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool	British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (BAPEN), 2008, 2010, 2011	Belonožkina, 2018	B
Subjektīvais globālais vērtējums	Subjective Global Assessment Form, SGA	Canadian Malnutrition Task Force, 2017	Sipatova, J., 2019	B
Malnutrīcijas riska pārbaude	Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS)	Kondrup et al., ESPEN gudelines for nutrition screening 2002, 2003	Branceviča, 2018	B
ESDM kontrollapas sadaļa Sociālās prasmes (bērniem)	Early Start Denver Model curriculum checklist for young children with autism, ESDM	Rogers & Dawson, 2010	Ļevičeva, 2019	B
Ēšanas pašefektivitātes aptauja, ESES-LV	Eating Self-efficacy Scale; ESES	Glynn, & Ruderman, 1986	Gēgerniece, 2018	B

* Explanation of Instrument Usage Condition Criteria A, B, and C (Detailed information is available in each instrument's description.)

A – The instrument is freely available for non-commercial research, provided that precise references to the instrument's authors are cited. (The instrument can be obtained by submitting an application to the Psychology Laboratory.)
B – A formal authorization is required. (Permission must be obtained from the authors or copyright holders, and the received authorization or a link to publicly available information about the permission must be submitted along with the application to the Psychology Laboratory.)
C – Only the instrument description is available in the Psychology Laboratory. (To obtain the instrument for use, direct contact with the copyright holder is required. Usage of the instrument may be subject to a fee or other conditions.)

For more detailed information about specific instruments, including their psychometric properties, you can request additional information via email at tarrsu[pnkts]lv.

The Psychology Laboratory's available information regarding instrument usage conditions may be incomplete or subject to change. In compliance with copyright regulations, always verify whether the usage conditions have been updated before using an instrument. If necessary, follow the instructions provided by the instrument author or copyright holder.

If you notice any discrepancies between the information in the register and the information obtained directly from the authors, please report this via email at tarrsu[pnkts]lv.

When using an instrument in your work, always provide a proper citation: Author's first and last name, instrument title in its original language, and year. Check whether the author has specific citation requirements. If the instrument has been adapted, additionally include adaptation author(s), title in Latvian, year of adaptation, source of acquisition (e.g., RSU Psychology Laboratory’s Registry of Tests and Surveys).

Quality of Life

Instrumenta nosaukums latviešu valodā	Original name of the instrument	Original author(s) of the instrument and year of publication	Adaptation author(s) and year of publication of the adapted version	Terms of use of the instrument*
Pusaudžu labbūtības novērtējuma instruments EPOCH	The EPOCH Measure of Adolescent Well-being	Kern et al., 2016	Pole, 2024	B
Subjektīvās labklājības aptauja	Subjective well-being scale	Diener, et al., 1999	Maļceva, 2017	A
Dzīves kvalitātes profils	Quality of Life Profile	Brown, et al., 1996	Apsīte, 2016	B
Pieaugušo aprūpētāju dzīves kvalitātes aptauja	Adult Care Quality of Life Questionnaire	Elwick, et al., 2010	Ļevičeva, 2019	A
Pasaules Veselības organizācijas dzīves kvalitātes novērtējuma anketa saīsinātā versija	WHOQOL-BREF	WHO, 1998	Ēriksone, 2016	B
Dzīves kvalitāte pacientiem ar nieru slimību, versija 1.3	Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form  (KDQOL-SF)	Hays et al., RAND publicējis 1997. gadā	Sipatova, 2019	A
Dzīves kvalitātes novērtēšanas anketa SF-36v2, LV un RUS	SF-36 Health Survey	Ware et al., 1993, 2000		C
Anketa par dzīves kvalitāti ar hroniskām brūcēm	Questionnaire on quality of life with chronic wounds	Bloom	Varena, 2019	B
Dzīves kvalitātes aptauja (KHQ)	The King’s health questionnaire	Kelleher, et al., 1997	Kauzova, 2019	B
Dzīvеs kvаlitātеs аr stоmu skаlа	Thе Stоmа Quаlity оf Lifе Sсаlе (SQОLS)	Yоung-Fаdоk, 2006	Streļcova, 2019	B
Utian dzīves kvalitātes skala	Utian Quality of Life Scale (UQOL)	Utian, et al., 2002	Višņevska, 2019	B
Viskonsinas nierakmeņu dzīves kvalitātes aptauja	Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life Questionnaire (WISQOL)	Penniston et al., 2016	Melberga, 2022	B
Psihiskās veselības kontinuuma īsā forma (The Latvian MHC-SF)	Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF)	Corey Keyes, 2005	Petrova, 2021	A

* Explanation of Instrument Usage Condition Criteria A, B, and C (Detailed information is available in each instrument's description.)

A – The instrument is freely available for non-commercial research, provided that precise references to the instrument's authors are cited. (The instrument can be obtained by submitting an application to the Psychology Laboratory.)
B – A formal authorization is required. (Permission must be obtained from the authors or copyright holders, and the received authorization or a link to publicly available information about the permission must be submitted along with the application to the Psychology Laboratory.)
C – Only the instrument description is available in the Psychology Laboratory. (To obtain the instrument for use, direct contact with the copyright holder is required. Usage of the instrument may be subject to a fee or other conditions.)

For more detailed information about specific instruments, including their psychometric properties, you can request additional information via email at tarrsu[pnkts]lv.

The Psychology Laboratory's available information regarding instrument usage conditions may be incomplete or subject to change. In compliance with copyright regulations, always verify whether the usage conditions have been updated before using an instrument. If necessary, follow the instructions provided by the instrument author or copyright holder.

If you notice any discrepancies between the information in the register and the information obtained directly from the authors, please report this via email at tarrsu[pnkts]lv.

When using an instrument in your work, always provide a proper citation: Author's first and last name, instrument title in its original language, and year. Check whether the author has specific citation requirements. If the instrument has been adapted, additionally include adaptation author(s), title in Latvian, year of adaptation, source of acquisition (e.g., RSU Psychology Laboratory’s Registry of Tests and Surveys).

Other

Name of the instrument in Latvian	Original name of the instrument	Original author(s) of the instrument and year of publication	Adaptation author(s) and year of publication of the adapted version	Terms of use of the instrument*
Multidimensionālā seksuālā Es koncepcijas aptauja	The Multidimensional Sexual Self-Concept Questionnaire (MSSCQ)	Snell, 2001	Liepa un Pakse, 2023	B

* Explanation of Instrument Usage Condition Criteria A, B, and C (Detailed information is available in each instrument's description.)

A – The instrument is freely available for non-commercial research, provided that precise references to the instrument's authors are cited. (The instrument can be obtained by submitting an application to the Psychology Laboratory.)
B – A formal authorization is required. (Permission must be obtained from the authors or copyright holders, and the received authorization or a link to publicly available information about the permission must be submitted along with the application to the Psychology Laboratory.)
C – Only the instrument description is available in the Psychology Laboratory. (To obtain the instrument for use, direct contact with the copyright holder is required. Usage of the instrument may be subject to a fee or other conditions.)

For more detailed information about specific instruments, including their psychometric properties, you can request additional information via email at tarrsu[pnkts]lv.

The Psychology Laboratory's available information regarding instrument usage conditions may be incomplete or subject to change. In compliance with copyright regulations, always verify whether the usage conditions have been updated before using an instrument. If necessary, follow the instructions provided by the instrument author or copyright holder.

If you notice any discrepancies between the information in the register and the information obtained directly from the authors, please report this via email at tarrsu[pnkts]lv.

When using an instrument in your work, always provide a proper citation: Author's first and last name, instrument title in its original language, and year. Check whether the author has specific citation requirements. If the instrument has been adapted, additionally include adaptation author(s), title in Latvian, year of adaptation, source of acquisition (e.g., RSU Psychology Laboratory’s Registry of Tests and Surveys).

Ask us a question